On 2026/1/10 00:24, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2026 at 7:37 AM Leon Hwang leon.hwang@linux.dev wrote:
[...]
@@ -3366,6 +3416,14 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *rw_im
save_args(m, &prog, regs_off, false, flags);
if (bpf_prog_copy_branch_snapshot(fentry)) {/* Get branch snapshot asap. */if (invoke_branch_snapshot(&prog, image, rw_image)) {ret = -EINVAL;goto cleanup;}}Andrii already tried to do it. I hated it back then and still hate the idea. We're not going to add custom logic for one specific use case no matter how appealing it sounds to save very limited LBR entries. The HW will get better, but we will be stuck with this optimization forever.
Understood, thanks for the explanation.
I won’t pursue this approach further.
Thanks, Leon