As the names of (struct test_key) members didn't reflect whether the key was used for TX or RX, the verification for the counters was done incorrectly for asymmetrical selftests.
Rename these with _tx appendix and fix checks in verify_counters(). While at it, as the checks are now correct, introduce skip_counters_checks, which is intended for tests where it's expected that a key that was set with setsockopt(sk, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_AO_INFO, ...) might had no chance of getting used on the wire.
Fixes the following failures, exposed by the previous commit:
not ok 51 server: Check current != rnext keys set before connect(): Counter pkt_good was expected to increase 0 => 0 for key 132:5 not ok 52 server: Check current != rnext keys set before connect(): Counter pkt_good was not expected to increase 0 => 21 for key 137:10
not ok 63 server: Check current flapping back on peer's RnextKey request: Counter pkt_good was expected to increase 0 => 0 for key 132:5 not ok 64 server: Check current flapping back on peer's RnextKey request: Counter pkt_good was not expected to increase 0 => 40 for key 137:10
Cc: Mohammad Nassiri mnassiri@ciena.com Fixes: 3c3ead555648 ("selftests/net: Add TCP-AO key-management test") Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov dima@arista.com --- .../testing/selftests/net/tcp_ao/key-management.c | 44 ++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tcp_ao/key-management.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tcp_ao/key-management.c index f6a9395e3cd7..24e62120b792 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tcp_ao/key-management.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tcp_ao/key-management.c @@ -417,9 +417,9 @@ struct test_key { matches_vrf : 1, is_current : 1, is_rnext : 1, - used_on_handshake : 1, - used_after_accept : 1, - used_on_client : 1; + used_on_server_tx : 1, + used_on_client_tx : 1, + skip_counters_checks : 1; };
struct key_collection { @@ -609,16 +609,14 @@ static int key_collection_socket(bool server, unsigned int port) addr = &this_ip_dest; sndid = key->client_keyid; rcvid = key->server_keyid; - set_current = key->is_current; - set_rnext = key->is_rnext; + key->used_on_client_tx = set_current = key->is_current; + key->used_on_server_tx = set_rnext = key->is_rnext; }
if (test_add_key_cr(sk, key->password, key->len, *addr, vrf, sndid, rcvid, key->maclen, key->alg, set_current, set_rnext)) test_key_error("setsockopt(TCP_AO_ADD_KEY)", key); - if (set_current || set_rnext) - key->used_on_handshake = 1; #ifdef DEBUG test_print("%s [%u/%u] key: { %s, %u:%u, %u, %u:%u:%u:%u (%u)}", server ? "server" : "client", i, collection.nr_keys, @@ -640,22 +638,22 @@ static void verify_counters(const char *tst_name, bool is_listen_sk, bool server for (i = 0; i < collection.nr_keys; i++) { struct test_key *key = &collection.keys[i]; uint8_t sndid, rcvid; - bool was_used; + bool rx_cnt_expected;
+ if (key->skip_counters_checks) + continue; if (server) { sndid = key->server_keyid; rcvid = key->client_keyid; - if (is_listen_sk) - was_used = key->used_on_handshake; - else - was_used = key->used_after_accept; + rx_cnt_expected = key->used_on_client_tx; } else { sndid = key->client_keyid; rcvid = key->server_keyid; - was_used = key->used_on_client; + rx_cnt_expected = key->used_on_server_tx; }
- test_tcp_ao_key_counters_cmp(tst_name, a, b, was_used, + test_tcp_ao_key_counters_cmp(tst_name, a, b, + rx_cnt_expected ? TEST_CNT_KEY_GOOD : 0, sndid, rcvid); } test_tcp_ao_counters_free(a); @@ -916,9 +914,8 @@ static int run_client(const char *tst_name, unsigned int port, current_index = nr_keys - 1; if (rnext_index < 0) rnext_index = nr_keys - 1; - collection.keys[current_index].used_on_handshake = 1; - collection.keys[rnext_index].used_after_accept = 1; - collection.keys[rnext_index].used_on_client = 1; + collection.keys[current_index].used_on_client_tx = 1; + collection.keys[rnext_index].used_on_server_tx = 1;
synchronize_threads(); /* 3: accepted => send data */ if (test_client_verify(sk, msg_sz, msg_nr, TEST_TIMEOUT_SEC)) { @@ -1059,7 +1056,16 @@ static void check_current_back(const char *tst_name, unsigned int port, test_error("Can't change the current key"); if (test_client_verify(sk, msg_len, nr_packets, TEST_TIMEOUT_SEC)) test_fail("verify failed"); - collection.keys[rotate_to_index].used_after_accept = 1; + /* There is a race here: between setting the current_key with + * setsockopt(TCP_AO_INFO) and starting to send some data - there + * might have been a segment received with the desired + * RNext_key set. In turn that would mean that the first outgoing + * segment will have the desired current_key (flipped back). + * Which is what the user/test wants. As it's racy, skip checking + * the counters, yet check what are the resulting current/rnext + * keys on both sides. + */ + collection.keys[rotate_to_index].skip_counters_checks = 1;
end_client(tst_name, sk, nr_keys, current_index, rnext_index, &tmp); } @@ -1089,7 +1095,7 @@ static void roll_over_keys(const char *tst_name, unsigned int port, } verify_current_rnext(tst_name, sk, -1, collection.keys[i].server_keyid); - collection.keys[i].used_on_client = 1; + collection.keys[i].used_on_server_tx = 1; synchronize_threads(); /* verify current/rnext */ } end_client(tst_name, sk, nr_keys, current_index, rnext_index, &tmp);