On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 7:49 PM Edgecombe, Rick P rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com wrote:
On Thu, 2025-08-07 at 13:16 -0700, Sagi Shahar wrote:
+#define XFEATURE_MASK_CET (XFEATURE_MASK_CET_USER | XFEATURE_MASK_CET_KERNEL)
+static void tdx_apply_cpuid_restrictions(struct kvm_cpuid2 *cpuid_data) +{
for (int i = 0; i < cpuid_data->nent; i++) {
struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *e = &cpuid_data->entries[i];
if (e->function == 0xd && e->index == 0) {
/*
* TDX module requires both XTILE_{CFG, DATA} to be set.
* Both bits are required for AMX to be functional.
*/
if ((e->eax & XFEATURE_MASK_XTILE) !=
XFEATURE_MASK_XTILE) {
e->eax &= ~XFEATURE_MASK_XTILE;
}
}
if (e->function == 0xd && e->index == 1) {
/*
* TDX doesn't support LBR yet.
* Disable bits from the XCR0 register.
*/
e->ecx &= ~XFEATURE_MASK_LBR;
/*
* TDX modules requires both CET_{U, S} to be set even
* if only one is supported.
*/
if (e->ecx & XFEATURE_MASK_CET)
e->ecx |= XFEATURE_MASK_CET;
}
}
+}
Since this is only going to be used control the directly configurable bits, do we really need to do this? SET_CPUID2 will just get what comes out of KVM_TDX_GET_CPUID, so it should pick up the correct values.
This code is used before vcpus are created so KVM_TDX_GET_CPUID can't be used here.
But either way, I removed this function in the next version.
<snip>
+static void tdx_td_init(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint64_t attributes) +{
struct kvm_tdx_init_vm *init_vm;
const struct kvm_cpuid2 *tmp;
struct kvm_cpuid2 *cpuid;
tmp = kvm_get_supported_cpuid();
cpuid = allocate_kvm_cpuid2(KVM_MAX_CPUID_ENTRIES);
memcpy(cpuid, tmp, kvm_cpuid2_size(tmp->nent));
tdx_mask_cpuid_features(cpuid);
init_vm = calloc(1, sizeof(*init_vm) +
sizeof(init_vm->cpuid.entries[0]) * cpuid->nent);
TEST_ASSERT(init_vm, "vm allocation failed");
memcpy(&init_vm->cpuid, cpuid, kvm_cpuid2_size(cpuid->nent));
free(cpuid);
init_vm->attributes = attributes;
tdx_apply_cpuid_restrictions(&init_vm->cpuid);
tdx_filter_cpuid(vm, &init_vm->cpuid);
tdx_ioctl(vm->fd, KVM_TDX_INIT_VM, 0, init_vm);
free(init_vm);
+}
We should comment the CPUID twiddling that happens here. It masks, filters, and applies restrictions. Sounds like all the same thing.