On 7/31/23 19:47, Meng Li wrote:
The previous function will be deprecated.
Signed-off-by: Meng Li li.meng@amd.com
This actually has functional impact; doesn't it? Can you better describe the reasoning and expected impact in the commit message?
drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c index 7f3fe2048981..9c889a4a0177 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c @@ -145,8 +145,6 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index) struct cpufreq_policy *policy = NULL; struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = NULL;
- highest_perf = amd_get_highest_perf();
- for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); if (!policy)
@@ -161,6 +159,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index) return; }
highest_perf = cppc_perf.highest_perf; nominal_perf = cppc_perf.nominal_perf; lowest_nonlinear_perf = cppc_perf.lowest_nonlinear_perf; lowest_perf = cppc_perf.lowest_perf;
@@ -172,6 +171,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index) return; }
highest_perf = AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF(cap1); nominal_perf = AMD_CPPC_NOMINAL_PERF(cap1); lowest_nonlinear_perf = AMD_CPPC_LOWNONLIN_PERF(cap1); lowest_perf = AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF(cap1);