On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 13:49:23 +0100 Petr Machata wrote:
This logging and xfail handling duplicates lib.sh. Would a patch like below be OK with you? The gist of it is to just use check_err, log_test and xfail_on_slow from lib.sh to achieve what the test open-codes.
Hm, maybe? I'm not going to say no if you send a patch, but IMHO if we were to change the output I think we should make it ktap.