On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 17:04, Jinjie Ruan ruanjinjie@huawei.com wrote:
The test_cases is not freed in kunit_free_suite_set().
And the copy pointer may be moved in kunit_filter_suites().
The filtered_suite and filtered_suite->test_cases allocated in the last kunit_filter_attr_tests() in last inner for loop may be leaked if kunit_filter_suites() fails.
If kunit_filter_suites() succeeds, not only copy but also filtered_suite and filtered_suite->test_cases should be freed.
Changes in v4:
- Make free_suite_set() take a void * for the 4th patch.
- Add Suggested-by and Reviewed-by.
- Correct the fix tag.
Changes in v3:
- Update the kfree_at_end() to use kunit_free_suite_set() for 4th patch.
- Update the commit message for the 4th patch.
Changes in v2:
- Add Reviewed-by.
- Add the memory leak backtrace for the 4th patch.
- Remove the unused func kernel test robot noticed for the 4th patch.
- Update the commit message for the 4th patch.
Jinjie Ruan (4): kunit: Fix missed memory release in kunit_free_suite_set() kunit: Fix the wrong kfree of copy for kunit_filter_suites() kunit: Fix possible memory leak in kunit_filter_suites() kunit: test: Fix the possible memory leak in executor_test
lib/kunit/executor.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------ lib/kunit/executor_test.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--
Thanks. This is all looking good to me.
The whole series is (still): Reviewed-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
Cheers, -- David