On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 08:42:34AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 12:50 AM Jiayuan Chen jiayuan.chen@linux.dev wrote:
thanks, but version 1.30 didn't work in my tests - even pahole's master branch fails, only the next branch works...
It seems that the 'old' pahole parses some kfuncs incorrectly, for example bpf_dynptr_slice().
l
Alan,
the introduction of the 'next' branch screwed up the workflow for many people. Let's remove it and merge everything into master. People expect master branch to be the one where active development is happening and the source of truth for the latest features.
My bad, I've been away for too long, next is supposed to be with things for a short while, testing for a few days, for CI consumption, then move to master, rinse repeat.
I think we should go back to that model.
- Arnaldo