On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 05:16:04PM -0700, Daniel Xu wrote:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 04:10:18PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:23 PM Daniel Xu dxu@dxuuu.xyz wrote:
include/net/xfrm.h | 9 + net/xfrm/Makefile | 1 + net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 2 + net/xfrm/xfrm_state_bpf.c | 128 ++++++++++++++ tools/lib/bpf/bpf_core_read.h | 34 ++++ .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tunnel.c | 162 +++++++++++++++++- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h | 1 + .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_tracing_net.h | 1 + .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_tunnel_kern.c | 138 ++++++++------- .../bpf/progs/verifier_bitfield_write.c | 100 +++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c | 7 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tunnel.sh | 92 ---------- 13 files changed, 522 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)
I really think this should go via bpf-next tree. The bpf changes are much bigger than ipsec.
Ack. Ended up picking up a lot of stuff along the way.
I'm fine with merging this via the bpf-next tree.
Please consider to merge the bpf hepler functions to one file. We have already xfrm_interface_bpf.c and now you introduce xfrm_state_bpf.c.
Try to merge this into a single xfrm_bpf.c file.