On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 3:37 PM Andrii Nakryiko andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 3:42 PM Hao Luo haoluo@google.com wrote:
If a ksym is defined with a type, libbpf will try to find the ksym's btf information from kernel btf. If a valid btf entry for the ksym is found, libbpf can pass in the found btf id to the verifier, which validates the ksym's type and value.
Typeless ksyms (i.e. those defined as 'void') will not have such btf_id, but it has the symbol's address (read from kallsyms) and its value is treated as a raw pointer.
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo haoluo@google.com
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 114 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c index 4a81c6b2d21b..94eff612c7c2 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c @@ -357,7 +357,16 @@ struct extern_desc { bool is_signed; } kcfg; struct {
unsigned long long addr;
/** 1. If ksym is typeless, the field 'addr' is valid.* 2. If ksym is typed, the field 'vmlinux_btf_id' is* valid.*/bool is_typeless;union {unsigned long long addr;int vmlinux_btf_id;};ksym is 16 bytes anyways, union doesn't help to save space. I propose to encode all this with just two fields: vmlinux_btf_id and addr. If btf_id == 0, then extern is typeless.
Ack on expanding the union. But I slightly preferred keeping is_typeless. IIUC, btf_id points a VAR_KIND, we need the following pointer chasing every time
t = btf__type_by_id(obj->btf, ext->btf_id); t->type;
which I felt is worse than keeping a is_typeless flag.
} ksym; };}; @@ -382,6 +391,7 @@ struct bpf_object {
bool loaded; bool has_pseudo_calls;
bool has_typed_ksyms; /* * Information when doing elf related work. Only valid if fd@@ -2521,6 +2531,10 @@ static int bpf_object__load_vmlinux_btf(struct bpf_object *obj) if (obj->btf_ext && obj->btf_ext->core_relo_info.len) need_vmlinux_btf = true;
/* Support for typed ksyms needs kernel BTF */if (obj->has_typed_ksyms)need_vmlinux_btf = true;On the second read, I don't think you really need `has_typed_ksyms` at all. Just iterate over ksym externs and see if you have a typed one. It's the only place that cares.
Ack. Will iterate over ksym externs here.
bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) { if (!prog->load) continue;@@ -2975,10 +2989,10 @@ static int bpf_object__collect_externs(struct bpf_object *obj) ext->type = EXT_KSYM;
vt = skip_mods_and_typedefs(obj->btf, t->type, NULL);
if (!btf_is_void(vt)) {pr_warn("extern (ksym) '%s' is not typeless (void)\n", ext_name);return -ENOTSUP;}
ext->ksym.is_typeless = btf_is_void(vt);if (!obj->has_typed_ksyms && !ext->ksym.is_typeless)obj->has_typed_ksyms = true;nit: keep it simple:
if (ext->ksym.is_typeless) obj->has_typed_ksyms = true;
Ack.
} else { pr_warn("unrecognized extern section '%s'\n", sec_name); return -ENOTSUP;@@ -2992,9 +3006,9 @@ static int bpf_object__collect_externs(struct bpf_object *obj) /* sort externs by type, for kcfg ones also by (align, size, name) */ qsort(obj->externs, obj->nr_extern, sizeof(*ext), cmp_externs);
/* for .ksyms section, we need to turn all externs into allocated* variables in BTF to pass kernel verification; we do this by* pretending that each extern is a 8-byte variable
/* for .ksyms section, we need to turn all typeless externs into* allocated variables in BTF to pass kernel verification; we do* this by pretending that each typeless extern is a 8-byte variable */ if (ksym_sec) { /* find existing 4-byte integer type in BTF to use for fake@@ -3012,7 +3026,7 @@ static int bpf_object__collect_externs(struct bpf_object *obj)
sec = ksym_sec; n = btf_vlen(sec);
for (i = 0, off = 0; i < n; i++, off += sizeof(int)) {
for (i = 0, off = 0; i < n; i++) { struct btf_var_secinfo *vs = btf_var_secinfos(sec) + i; struct btf_type *vt;@@ -3025,9 +3039,14 @@ static int bpf_object__collect_externs(struct bpf_object *obj) return -ESRCH; } btf_var(vt)->linkage = BTF_VAR_GLOBAL_ALLOCATED;
vt->type = int_btf_id;
if (ext->ksym.is_typeless) {vt->type = int_btf_id;vs->size = sizeof(int);} vs->offset = off;
vs->size = sizeof(int);
off += vs->size;pr_debug("ksym var_secinfo: var '%s', type #%d, size %d, offset %d\n",ext->name, vt->type, vs->size, vs->offset);It's a bit of a waste that we still allocate memory for those typed ksym externs, as they don't really need space. But modifying BTF is a pain right now, so I think we'll have to do it, until we have a better BTF API. But let's make them integers for now to take a fixed and small amount of space.
Do you mean making typed ksym externs of type integer? If so, we can't do that, I think. After collect_externs, we later need to compare the declared extern's type against the type defined in kernel. Better not rewrite their types in BTf.
I am generally against modifying BTF. I initially didn't notice that all the ksym externs' types are modified to 'int' and the type comparison I mentioned above always failed. I dumped the btf in vmlinux and the btf in object file, checked the kernel variable's source code, printed out everything I could. The experience was very bad.
} sec->size = off; }@@ -5300,8 +5319,13 @@ bpf_program__relocate(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_object *obj) insn[0].imm = obj->maps[obj->kconfig_map_idx].fd; insn[1].imm = ext->kcfg.data_off; } else /* EXT_KSYM */ {
insn[0].imm = (__u32)ext->ksym.addr;insn[1].imm = ext->ksym.addr >> 32;
if (ext->ksym.is_typeless) { /* typelss ksyms */typo: typeless
Ack.
insn[0].imm = (__u32)ext->ksym.addr;insn[1].imm = ext->ksym.addr >> 32;} else { /* typed ksyms */insn[0].src_reg = BPF_PSEUDO_BTF_ID;insn[0].imm = ext->ksym.vmlinux_btf_id;} } break; case RELO_CALL:@@ -6019,6 +6043,10 @@ static int bpf_object__read_kallsyms_file(struct bpf_object *obj) if (!ext || ext->type != EXT_KSYM) continue;
/* Typed ksyms have the verifier to fill their addresses. */if (!ext->ksym.is_typeless)continue;It might still be a good idea to try to find the symbol in kallsyms and emit nicer message if it's not there. Think about the user's experience when some global variable is removed from the kernel (or compiled out due to missing Kconfig). If libbpf can easily detect this, we should do it and provide a good error message.
Ack.
if (ext->is_set && ext->ksym.addr != sym_addr) { pr_warn("extern (ksym) '%s' resolution is ambiguous: 0x%llx or 0x%llx\n", sym_name, ext->ksym.addr, sym_addr);@@ -6037,10 +6065,72 @@ static int bpf_object__read_kallsyms_file(struct bpf_object *obj) return err; }
+static int bpf_object__resolve_ksyms_btf_id(struct bpf_object *obj) +{
struct extern_desc *ext;int i, id;if (!obj->btf_vmlinux) {pr_warn("support of typed ksyms needs kernel btf.\n");return -ENOENT;}for (i = 0; i < obj->nr_extern; i++) {const struct btf_type *v, *vx; /* VARs in object and vmlinux btf */const struct btf_type *t, *tx; /* TYPEs in btf */__u32 vt, vtx; /* btf_ids of TYPEs */I use targ_ and local_ prefixes with CO-RE to distinguish something that's coming from BPF object's BTF vs kernel's BTF, can you please adopt the same, as the process is essentially the same. "vx" vs "vtx" vs "v" are hard to distinguish and understand.
No problem. Will follow the convention.
ext = &obj->externs[i];if (ext->type != EXT_KSYM)continue;if (ext->ksym.is_typeless)continue;nit: combine into a single filter condition (we need typed ksym, that's one check)
Ack.
if (ext->is_set) {pr_warn("typed ksym '%s' resolved as typeless ksyms.\n",ext->name);return -EFAULT;this is a bug if that happens, that should be caught by test, please remove unnecessary check
Ack.
}id = btf__find_by_name_kind(obj->btf_vmlinux, ext->name,BTF_KIND_VAR);if (id <= 0) {pr_warn("no btf entry for ksym '%s' in vmlinux.\n",ext->name);return -ESRCH;}vx = btf__type_by_id(obj->btf_vmlinux, id);tx = skip_mods_and_typedefs(obj->btf_vmlinux, vx->type, &vtx);v = btf__type_by_id(obj->btf, ext->btf_id);t = skip_mods_and_typedefs(obj->btf, v->type, &vt);if (!btf_ksym_type_match(obj->btf_vmlinux, vtx, obj->btf, vt)) {const char *tname, *txname; /* names of TYPEs */txname = btf__name_by_offset(obj->btf_vmlinux, tx->name_off);tname = btf__name_by_offset(obj->btf, t->name_off);pr_warn("ksym '%s' expects type '%s' (vmlinux_btf_id: #%d), ""but got '%s' (btf_id: #%d)\n", ext->name,txname, vtx, tname, vt);return -EINVAL;}yeah, definitely just use bpf_core_types_are_compat() here. You'll want to skip_mods_and_typedefs first, but everything else should work for your use case.
Ack. bpf_core_types_are_compat() is indeed a perfect fit here.
[...]