On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 01:10:04PM +0000, Liu, Yi L wrote:
From: Jason Gunthorpe jgg@nvidia.com Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 9:05 PM
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 01:28:41PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c index 5db283c17e0d..491bcde1ff96 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c @@ -4074,6 +4074,25 @@ static struct iommu_domain
*intel_iommu_domain_alloc(unsigned type)
return NULL; } +static struct iommu_domain * +intel_iommu_domain_alloc_user(struct device *dev, u32 flags) +{
- struct iommu_domain *domain;
- struct intel_iommu *iommu;
- iommu = device_to_iommu(dev, NULL, NULL);
- if (!iommu)
return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);- if ((flags & IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC_NEST_PARENT) && !ecap_nest(iommu-
ecap))
return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);There is a check missing for supported flags
if (flags & (~IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC_NEST_PARENT)) return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
Well, the iommufd has such check. But I also noticed your another reply to Weijiang. So your preference is to do the flags validation in iommu driver instead of iommufd. Isn't it?
The core code should check that only kernel known bits are set
The driver code should check that only driver supported bits are set.
Today there is only one bit so the checks are the same code.
Tomorrow when we add a new bit the checks will not be the same
Jason