On Sun, Sep 01, 2024 at 07:40:33PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
-static void reference_chacha20_blocks(uint8_t *dst_bytes, const uint32_t *key, size_t nblocks) +static void reference_chacha20_blocks(uint8_t *dst_bytes, const uint32_t *key, uint32_t *counter, size_t nblocks) { uint32_t s[16] = { 0x61707865U, 0x3320646eU, 0x79622d32U, 0x6b206574U,
key[0], key[1], key[2], key[3], key[4], key[5], key[6], key[7]
key[0], key[1], key[2], key[3], key[4], key[5], key[6], key[7],
counter[0], counter[1],
While you're doing this, also add the remaining, `0, 0` elements.
if (memcmp(output1, output2, sizeof(output1)) ||
memcmp(counter2, counter2, sizeof(counter1)))
counter2 will always be counter2. You meant for the first argument to be counter1.
- reference_chacha20_blocks(output1, key, counter1, BLOCKS);
- __arch_chacha20_blocks_nostack(output2, key, counter2, BLOCKS);
- if (memcmp(output1, output2, sizeof(output1)) ||
memcmp(counter2, counter2, sizeof(counter1)))
return KSFT_FAIL;
- reference_chacha20_blocks(output1, key, counter1, BLOCKS);
- __arch_chacha20_blocks_nostack(output2, key, counter2, BLOCKS);
- if (memcmp(output1, output2, sizeof(output1)) ||
memcmp(counter2, counter2, sizeof(counter1)))
return KSFT_FAIL;
Why repeat these two stanzas? Also, same issue with counter2 used twice in that memcmp.