On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 11:45:18AM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
This IOCTL, PAGEMAP_SCAN on pagemap file can be used to get and/or clear the info about page table entries. The following operations are supported in this ioctl:
- Get the information if the pages have been written-to (PAGE_IS_Wt), file mapped (PAGE_IS_FILE), present (PAGE_IS_PRESENT) or swapped (PAGE_IS_SWAPPED).
 - Write-protect the pages (PAGEMAP_WP_ENGAGE) to start finding which pages have been written-to.
 - Find pages which have been written-to and write protect the pages (atomic PAGE_IS_NOT_WP + PAGEMAP_WP_ENGAGE)
 The uffd should have been registered on the memory range before performing any WP/WT (Write Protect/Writtern-To) related operations with the IOCTL.
struct pagemap_scan_args is used as the argument of the IOCTL. In this struct:
- The range is specified through start and len.
 - The output buffer and size is specified as vec and vec_len.
 - The optional maximum requested pages are specified in the max_pages.
 - The flags can be specified in the flags field. The PAGEMAP_WP_ENGAGE is the only added flag at this time.
 - The masks are specified in required_mask, anyof_mask, excluded_ mask and return_mask.
 This IOCTL can be extended to get information about more PTE bits. This patch has evolved from a basic patch from Gabriel Krisman Bertazi.
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum usama.anjum@collabora.com
Changes in v7:
- Rebase on top of latest next
 - Fix some corner cases
 - Base soft-dirty on the uffd wp async
 - Update the terminologies
 - Optimize the memory usage inside the ioctl
 Changes in v6:
- Rename variables and update comments
 - Make IOCTL independent of soft_dirty config
 - Change masks and bitmap type to _u64
 - Improve code quality
 Changes in v5:
- Remove tlb flushing even for clear operation
 Changes in v4:
- Update the interface and implementation
 Changes in v3:
- Tighten the user-kernel interface by using explicit types and add more error checking
 Changes in v2:
- Convert the interface from syscall to ioctl
 - Remove pidfd support as it doesn't make sense in ioctl
 
fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 300 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/uapi/linux/fs.h | 50 ++++++ tools/include/uapi/linux/fs.h | 50 ++++++ 3 files changed, 400 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c index e35a0398db63..ba70faadf403 100644 --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ #include <linux/shmem_fs.h> #include <linux/uaccess.h> #include <linux/pkeys.h> +#include <linux/minmax.h> #include <asm/elf.h> #include <asm/tlb.h> @@ -1135,6 +1136,22 @@ static inline void clear_soft_dirty(struct vm_area_struct *vma, } #endif +static inline bool is_pte_uffd_wp(pte_t pte) +{
- if ((pte_present(pte) && pte_uffd_wp(pte)) ||
 (is_swap_pte(pte) && pte_swp_uffd_wp(pte)))return true;
This is an interesting way to detect whether the page is written.. I would have thought you would reuse soft-dirty bit.
For swap case, you missed the pte markers (which can exist for !anon memory). You can have a look at pte_swp_uffd_wp_any().
- return false;
 +}
+static inline bool is_pmd_uffd_wp(pmd_t pmd) +{
- if ((pmd_present(pmd) && pmd_uffd_wp(pmd)) ||
 (is_swap_pmd(pmd) && pmd_swp_uffd_wp(pmd)))return true;- return false;
 +}
#if defined(CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY) && defined(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) static inline void clear_soft_dirty_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdp) @@ -1763,11 +1780,294 @@ static int pagemap_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) return 0; } +#define PAGEMAP_OP_MASK (PAGE_IS_WT | PAGE_IS_FILE | \
PAGE_IS_PRESENT | PAGE_IS_SWAPPED)+#define PAGEMAP_NONWT_OP_MASK (PAGE_IS_FILE | PAGE_IS_PRESENT | PAGE_IS_SWAPPED) +#define IS_WP_ENGAGE_OP(a) (a->flags & PAGEMAP_WP_ENGAGE) +#define IS_GET_OP(a) (a->vec) +#define PAGEMAP_SCAN_BITMAP(wt, file, present, swap) \
- (wt | file << 1 | present << 2 | swap << 3)
 +#define IS_WT_REQUIRED(a) \
- ((a->required_mask & PAGE_IS_WT) || \
 (a->anyof_mask & PAGE_IS_WT))+struct pagemap_scan_private {
- struct page_region *vec;
 - struct page_region prev;
 - unsigned long vec_len, vec_index;
 - unsigned int max_pages, found_pages, flags;
 - unsigned long required_mask, anyof_mask, excluded_mask, return_mask;
 +};
+static int pagemap_scan_test_walk(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, struct mm_walk *walk) +{
- struct pagemap_scan_private *p = walk->private;
 - struct vm_area_struct *vma = walk->vma;
 - if (IS_WT_REQUIRED(p) && !vma_can_userfault(vma, vma->vm_flags))
 return -EPERM;
vma_can_userfault() is too coarse. Maybe what you wanted to check is userfaultfd_wp(vma)?
- if (IS_GET_OP(p) && p->max_pages && (p->found_pages == p->max_pages))
 return -ENOSPC;
This is the function to test "whether the walker should walk the vma specified". This check should IIUC be meaningless because found_pages doesn't boost during vma switching, while OTOH your pmd walker fn should do proper check when increasing found_pages and return -ENOSPC properly when the same condition met. That should be enough, IMHO.
I saw it already a few times in this patch, I think maybe you want a helper for this one taking *p as argument.
- if (vma->vm_flags & VM_PFNMAP)
 return 1;- return 0;
 +}
+static inline int add_to_out(bool wt, bool file, bool pres, bool swap,
struct pagemap_scan_private *p, unsigned long addr, unsigned int len)+{
- unsigned long bitmap, cur = PAGEMAP_SCAN_BITMAP(wt, file, pres, swap);
 - bool cpy = true;
 - struct page_region *prev = &p->prev;
 - if (p->required_mask)
 cpy = ((p->required_mask & cur) == p->required_mask);- if (cpy && p->anyof_mask)
 cpy = (p->anyof_mask & cur);- if (cpy && p->excluded_mask)
 cpy = !(p->excluded_mask & cur);- bitmap = cur & p->return_mask;
 - if (cpy && bitmap) {
 if ((prev->len) && (prev->bitmap == bitmap) &&(prev->start + prev->len * PAGE_SIZE == addr)) {prev->len += len;p->found_pages += len;} else if (p->vec_index < p->vec_len) {if (prev->len) {memcpy(&p->vec[p->vec_index], prev, sizeof(struct page_region));p->vec_index++;}prev->start = addr;prev->len = len;prev->bitmap = bitmap;p->found_pages += len;} else {return -ENOSPC;}
[1]
- }
 - return 0;
 +}
+static inline int export_prev_to_out(struct pagemap_scan_private *p, struct page_region __user *vec,
unsigned long *vec_index)+{
- struct page_region *prev = &p->prev;
 - if (prev->len) {
 if (copy_to_user(&vec[*vec_index], prev, sizeof(struct page_region)))return -EFAULT;p->vec_index++;(*vec_index)++;prev->len = 0;- }
 - return 0;
 +}
I'd rather not have this helper; it doesn't really help a lot.
+static inline int pagemap_scan_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
unsigned long end, struct mm_walk *walk)+{
- struct pagemap_scan_private *p = walk->private;
 - struct vm_area_struct *vma = walk->vma;
 - unsigned long start = addr;
 - unsigned int len;
 - spinlock_t *ptl;
 - int ret = 0;
 - pte_t *pte;
 - bool pmd_wt;
 - if ((walk->vma->vm_end < addr) || (p->max_pages && p->found_pages == p->max_pages))
 return 0;- end = min(end, walk->vma->vm_end);
 
None of the check above is needed, I think..
vma ranges are checked before pmd_entry() called. found_pages should be checked when increased (I think it's [1] above).
+#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
- ptl = pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma);
 - if (ptl) {
 pmd_wt = !is_pmd_uffd_wp(*pmd);/** Break huge page into small pages if operation needs to be performed is* on a portion of the huge page or the return buffer cannot store complete* data.*/if (pmd_wt && (IS_WP_ENGAGE_OP(p) && (end - addr < HPAGE_SIZE))) {spin_unlock(ptl);split_huge_pmd(vma, pmd, addr);goto process_smaller_pages;}if (IS_GET_OP(p)) {len = (end - addr)/PAGE_SIZE;if (p->max_pages && p->found_pages + len > p->max_pages)len = p->max_pages - p->found_pages;ret = add_to_out(pmd_wt, vma->vm_file, pmd_present(*pmd),is_swap_pmd(*pmd), p, addr, len);if (ret) {spin_unlock(ptl);return ret;}}spin_unlock(ptl);if (IS_WP_ENGAGE_OP(p) && pmd_wt) {BUG_ON(start & ~HPAGE_MASK);ret = wp_range_async(vma, addr, HPAGE_SIZE);}return ret;- }
 +process_smaller_pages:
- if (pmd_trans_unstable(pmd))
 return 0;+#endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
- pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
 - for (; addr < end && !ret && (!p->max_pages || (p->found_pages < p->max_pages))
 ; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {if (IS_GET_OP(p)) {
This 'if' should be out - skip loop if not needed.
ret = add_to_out(!is_pte_uffd_wp(*pte), vma->vm_file, pte_present(*pte),is_swap_pte(*pte), p, addr, 1);if (ret)break;}- }
 - pte_unmap_unlock(pte - 1, ptl);
 - if (IS_WP_ENGAGE_OP(p)) {
 BUG_ON(start & ~PAGE_MASK);ret = wp_range_async(vma, start, addr - start);- }
 - cond_resched();
 - return ret;
 +}
+static int pagemap_scan_pte_hole(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, int depth,
struct mm_walk *walk)+{
- struct pagemap_scan_private *p = walk->private;
 - struct vm_area_struct *vma = walk->vma;
 - unsigned int len;
 - int ret = 0;
 - if (vma) {
 len = (end - addr)/PAGE_SIZE;if (p->max_pages && p->found_pages + len > p->max_pages)len = p->max_pages - p->found_pages;ret = add_to_out(false, vma->vm_file, false, false, p, addr, len);- }
 - return ret;
 +}
+static const struct mm_walk_ops pagemap_scan_ops = {
- .test_walk = pagemap_scan_test_walk,
 - .pmd_entry = pagemap_scan_pmd_entry,
 
Do we care about hugetlb at all? So far it seems you don't. It's fine, then if you decided to go the uffd-wp way you can explicit declare no support on hugetlb, as uffd-wp sync supports it so it should be by default supported otherwise.
- .pte_hole = pagemap_scan_pte_hole,
 +};