On 07/11/20 12:15 am, Marco Elver wrote:
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 at 19:28, Arpitha Raghunandan 98.arpi@gmail.com wrote:
Implementation of support for parameterized testing in KUnit. This approach requires the creation of a test case using the KUNIT_CASE_PARAM macro that accepts a generator function as input. This generator function should return the next parameter given the previous parameter in parameterized tests. It also provides a macro to generate common-case generators.
Signed-off-by: Arpitha Raghunandan 98.arpi@gmail.com Co-developed-by: Marco Elver elver@google.com Signed-off-by: Marco Elver elver@google.com
[...]
kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case)kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case);
kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) {struct kunit test = { .param_value = NULL, .param_index = 0 };bool test_success = true;if (test_case->generate_params)test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(NULL);do {kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test);test_success &= test_case->success;if (test_case->generate_params) {kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test,KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT"# %s: param-%d %s",test_case->name, test.param_index,kunit_status_to_string(test.success));Sorry, I still found something. The patch I sent had this aligned with the '(', whereas when I apply this patch it no longer is aligned. Why?
I see the rest of the file also aligns arguments with opening '(', so I think your change is inconsistent.
Ah those lines had spaces instead of tab and I think I messed up the alignment fixing that. I will send another version fixing this. Thanks!
Thanks, -- Marco