On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 6:47 AM Andrii Nakryiko andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 8:40 PM Menglong Dong menglong8.dong@gmail.com wrote:
Some functions is recursive for the kprobe_multi and impact the benchmark results. So just skip them.
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong dongml2@chinatelecom.cn
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c index d24baf244d1f..9da9da51b132 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c @@ -559,6 +559,22 @@ static bool skip_entry(char *name) if (!strncmp(name, "__ftrace_invalid_address__", sizeof("__ftrace_invalid_address__") - 1)) return true;
if (!strcmp(name, "migrate_disable"))return true;if (!strcmp(name, "migrate_enable"))return true;if (!strcmp(name, "rcu_read_unlock_strict"))return true;if (!strcmp(name, "preempt_count_add"))return true;if (!strcmp(name, "preempt_count_sub"))return true;if (!strcmp(name, "__rcu_read_lock"))return true;if (!strcmp(name, "__rcu_read_unlock"))return true;static const char *trace_blacklist[] = { "migrate_disable", "migrate_enable", ... };
it's not like it's one or two functions where copy-pasting strcmp might be fine
OK!
pw-bot: cr
return false;}
-- 2.50.1