On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 8:44 AM Yonghong Song yhs@fb.com wrote:
On 5/17/22 7:50 PM, Feng zhou wrote:
From: Feng Zhou zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com
comments from Andrii Nakryiko, details in here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220511093854.411-1-zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com/...
use /* */ instead of // use libbpf_num_possible_cpus() instead of sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN) use 8 bytes for value size fix memory leak use ASSERT_EQ instead of ASSERT_OK add bpf_loop to fetch values on each possible CPU
Fixes: ed7c13776e20c74486b0939a3c1de984c5efb6aa ("selftests/bpf: add test case for bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem") Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com
Acked-by: Yonghong Song yhs@fb.com
I've fixed remaining formatting issues and added my_pid check to avoid accidental interference with other tests/processes. Applied to bpf-next, thanks.