On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 3:58 AM Greg KH gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 04:01:16PM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
Add a test for string stream along with a simpler example.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com
kunit/Kconfig | 12 ++++++ kunit/Makefile | 4 ++ kunit/example-test.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kunit/string-stream-test.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 165 insertions(+) create mode 100644 kunit/example-test.c create mode 100644 kunit/string-stream-test.c
diff --git a/kunit/Kconfig b/kunit/Kconfig index 64480092b2c24..5cb500355c873 100644 --- a/kunit/Kconfig +++ b/kunit/Kconfig @@ -13,4 +13,16 @@ config KUNIT special hardware. For more information, please see Documentation/kunit/
+config KUNIT_TEST
bool "KUnit test for KUnit"
depends on KUNIT
help
Enables KUnit test to test KUnit.
+config KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST
bool "Example test for KUnit"
depends on KUNIT
help
Enables example KUnit test to demo features of KUnit.
Can't these tests be module?
At this time, no. KUnit doesn't support loading tests as kernel modules; it is something we could add in in the future, but I would rather not open that can of worms right now. There are some other things I would like to do that would probably be easier to do before adding support for tests as loadable modules.
Or am I mis-reading the previous logic?
Anyway, just a question, nothing objecting to this as-is for now.
Cool
Cheers!