On Mon, 05 May 2025 17:14:08 +0100, Jiaqi Yan jiaqiyan@google.com wrote:
Certain microarchitectures (e.g. Neoverse V2) do not keep track of the faulting address for a memory load that consumes poisoned data and results in a synchronous external abort (SEA). This means the faulting guest physical address is unavailable when KVM handles such SEA in EL2, and FAR_EL2 just holds a garbage value.
I don't understand. FAR_ELx holds a *virtual* address, and never a physical address (that'd be PFAR_ELx).
In case VMM later asks KVM to synchronously inject a SEA into the guest, KVM should set FnV bit
- in VCPU's ESR_EL1 to let guest kernel know that FAR_EL1 is invalid and holds garbage value
- in VCPU's ESR_EL2 to let nested virtualization know that FAR_EL2 is invalid and holds garbage value
Signed-off-by: Jiaqi Yan jiaqiyan@google.com
arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c index a640e839848e6..b4f9a09952ead 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c @@ -81,6 +81,9 @@ static void inject_abt64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_iabt, unsigned long addr if (!is_iabt) esr |= ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_LOW << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT;
- if (!kvm_vcpu_sea_far_valid(vcpu))
esr |= ESR_ELx_FnV;
I don't understand what this has anything to do with the uarch details you talk about in the commit message. If the VMM inject an exception, surely it has populated the exception context itself. I don't even see how we'd end-up here (__kvm_arm_vcpu_set_events? seems unlikely).
M.