On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 02:39:05PM +0100, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
Commit 33f082614c34 ("arm64: signal: Allow expansion of the signal frame") introduced the BASE_SIGFRAME_SIZE macro but it has apparently never been used.
Nit: Should there be a statement of what the patch does?
Same throughout the series.
(Yes, I know it's in the subject line, but Mutt doesn't think that's part of the message body, so I can't see it now that I'm replying... and submitting-patches.rst and e.g., maintainer-tip.rst seem to take the same policy, albeit without quite stating it explicitly.)
Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky kevin.brodsky@arm.com
Weird. Maybe there are places where this could have been used, but I guess we have managed fine without it.
Or possibly some unmerged version of the SVE patches used this but it disappeared in refactoring.
Either way:
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin Dave.Martin@arm.com
arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c index 561986947530..dc998326e24d 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c @@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ struct rt_sigframe_user_layout { unsigned long end_offset; }; -#define BASE_SIGFRAME_SIZE round_up(sizeof(struct rt_sigframe), 16) #define TERMINATOR_SIZE round_up(sizeof(struct _aarch64_ctx), 16) #define EXTRA_CONTEXT_SIZE round_up(sizeof(struct extra_context), 16) -- 2.43.0