On 2025/6/11 17:48, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 05:40:06PM +0800, Pu Lehui wrote:
On 2025/6/11 17:18, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 08:40:11AM +0000, Pu Lehui wrote:
From: Pu Lehui pulehui@huawei.com
As generic read_sysfs is available in vm_utils, let's use is in thuge-gen test.
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui pulehui@huawei.com
With the fix below:
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com
will send new soon, thanks!
It generally looks good, just one point about a warning below to address.
tools/testing/selftests/mm/thuge-gen.c | 37 +++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/thuge-gen.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/thuge-gen.c index 95b6f043a3cb..e11dfbfa661b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/thuge-gen.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/thuge-gen.c @@ -77,40 +77,19 @@ void show(unsigned long ps) system(buf); }
-unsigned long thuge_read_sysfs(int warn, char *fmt, ...) +unsigned long read_free(unsigned long ps) {
- char *line = NULL;
 - size_t linelen = 0;
 - char buf[100];
 - FILE *f;
 - va_list ap; unsigned long val = 0;
 
- char buf[100];
 
- va_start(ap, fmt);
 - vsnprintf(buf, sizeof buf, fmt, ap);
 - va_end(ap);
 
- snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
 "/sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-%lukB/free_hugepages",ps >> 10);- read_sysfs(buf, &val);
 We're losing all of the 'warn' logic here so if we can't find /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-%lukB/free_hugepages when ps != getpagesize() we no longer print a message about it.
Hi Lorenzo,
Thanks for review. Right, we should explicit that warning when ps != getpagesize(). How about the following modify?
Looks good to me!
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/thuge-gen.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/thuge-gen.c index e11dfbfa661b..8e2b08dc5762 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/thuge-gen.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/thuge-gen.c @@ -85,7 +85,8 @@ unsigned long read_free(unsigned long ps) snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "/sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-%lukB/free_hugepages", ps >> 10);
read_sysfs(buf, &val);
if (read_sysfs(buf, &val) && ps != getpagesize())ksft_print_msg("missing %s\n", buf); return val;}
Should we reinstate that?
Other than this, we're ignoring errors, which by default means we return 0, but this is what we were doing anyway. It's only this case I think that matters.
- f = fopen(buf, "r");
 - if (!f) {
 if (warn)ksft_print_msg("missing %s\n", buf);return 0;- }
 - if (getline(&line, &linelen, f) > 0) {
 sscanf(line, "%lu", &val);- }
 - fclose(f);
 - free(line); return val; }
 -unsigned long read_free(unsigned long ps) -{
- return thuge_read_sysfs(ps != getpagesize(),
 "/sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-%lukB/free_hugepages",ps >> 10);-}
- void test_mmap(unsigned long size, unsigned flags) { char *map;
 @@ -173,6 +152,7 @@ void test_shmget(unsigned long size, unsigned flags) void find_pagesizes(void) { unsigned long largest = getpagesize();
- unsigned long shmmax_val = 0; int i; glob_t g;
 @@ -195,7 +175,8 @@ void find_pagesizes(void) } globfree(&g);
- if (thuge_read_sysfs(0, "/proc/sys/kernel/shmmax") < NUM_PAGES * largest)
 
- read_sysfs("/proc/sys/kernel/shmmax", &shmmax_val);
 - if (shmmax_val < NUM_PAGES * largest) ksft_exit_fail_msg("Please do echo %lu > /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax", largest * NUM_PAGES);
 -- 2.34.1