On 28/11/23 12:15, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Marco Pagani marpagan@redhat.com writes:
Hello Marco,
[...]
@@ -737,12 +738,14 @@ static void kunit_module_exit(struct module *mod) }; const char *action = kunit_action();
- if (!suite_set.start || !virt_addr_valid(suite_set.start))
return;I would add a comment here explaining why this condition is checked and what it means. Maybe something like the following ?
/** Check if the kunit test suite start address is a virtual* address or a direct mapping address. This is used as an* indication of whether the kunit_filter_suites() was used* to filter the kunit test suite or not.** If is not a virtual address, then this means that the* kunit_module_init() function was not called and the kunit* suite was not filtered. Let's just bail out in that case.*/if (!suite_set.start || !virt_addr_valid(suite_set.start))return;
Good point. I'll add a comment in v3.
The patch makes sense to me though and agree that is a better approach.
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas javierm@redhat.com
Thanks, Marco