21 Jul
2022
21 Jul
'22
11:54 a.m.
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 06:10:22PM +0200, netdev@kapio-technology.com wrote:
Okay, I see the problem you refer to. I think that we have to accept some limitations unless you think that just zeroing the specific port bit in the DPV would be a better solution, and there wouldn't be caveats with that besides having to do a FDB search etc to get the correct DPV if I am not too mistaken.
No, honestly I believe that what we should do to improve the limitation is to have proper ATU database separation between one VLAN-unaware bridge and another (i.e. what is now MV88E6XXX_FID_BRIDGED to be one FID per bridge).