On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:01:30AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
It's no longer required to use nth_page() when iterating pages within a single SG entry, so let's drop the nth_page() usage.
Acked-by: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org Cc: Maxim Levitsky maximlevitsky@gmail.com Cc: Alex Dubov oakad@yahoo.com Cc: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand david@redhat.com
LGTM, so:
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com
drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c b/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c index c9853d887d282..d3f160dc0da4c 100644 --- a/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c +++ b/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c @@ -560,8 +560,7 @@ static int h_mspro_block_transfer_data(struct memstick_dev *card, t_offset += msb->current_page * msb->page_size;
sg_set_page(&t_sg,
nth_page(sg_page(&(msb->req_sg[msb->current_seg])),t_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT),
sg_page(&(msb->req_sg[msb->current_seg])) + (t_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT), msb->page_size, offset_in_page(t_offset));memstick_init_req_sg(*mrq, msb->data_dir == READ
-- 2.50.1