On 2023-09-11 at 09:59:06 -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
Hi Maciej, When I build the tests with this applied I encounter the following:
resctrlfs.c: In function ‘write_schemata’: resctrlfs.c:475:14: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘open’; did you mean ‘popen’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 475 | fd = open(controlgroup, O_WRONLY); | ^~~~ | popen resctrlfs.c:475:33: error: ‘O_WRONLY’ undeclared (first use in this function) 475 | fd = open(controlgroup, O_WRONLY); | ^~~~~~~~ resctrlfs.c:475:33: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
Hmm, that's odd. How do you build the tests?
I use "make -C tools/testing/selftests/resctrl" while in the root kernel source directory. I tried to get the same error you experienced by compiling some dummy test program with "open" and "O_WRONLY". From the experiment I found that the "resctrl.h" header provides the declarations that are causing your errors.
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c index bd36ee206602..b0b14a5bcbf5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c @@ -488,9 +488,8 @@ int write_bm_pid_to_resctrl(pid_t bm_pid, char *ctrlgrp, char *mongrp, */ int write_schemata(char *ctrlgrp, char *schemata, int cpu_no, char *resctrl_val) {
- char controlgroup[1024], schema[1024], reason[64];
- int resource_id, ret = 0;
- FILE *fp;
- char controlgroup[1024], schema[1024], reason[128];
- int resource_id, fd, schema_len = -1, ret = 0;
if (strncmp(resctrl_val, MBA_STR, sizeof(MBA_STR)) && strncmp(resctrl_val, MBM_STR, sizeof(MBM_STR)) && @@ -518,27 +517,30 @@ int write_schemata(char *ctrlgrp, char *schemata, int cpu_no, char *resctrl_val) if (!strncmp(resctrl_val, CAT_STR, sizeof(CAT_STR)) || !strncmp(resctrl_val, CMT_STR, sizeof(CMT_STR)))
sprintf(schema, "%s%d%c%s", "L3:", resource_id, '=', schemata);
schema_len = snprintf(schema, sizeof(schema), "%s%d%c%s\n","L3:", resource_id, '=', schemata);
sprintf(schema, "%s%d%c%s", "MB:", resource_id, '=', schemata);
schema_len = snprintf(schema, sizeof(schema), "%s%d%c%s\n","MB:", resource_id, '=', schemata);
- fp = fopen(controlgroup, "w");
- if (!fp) {
- fd = open(controlgroup, O_WRONLY);
- if (!fd) { sprintf(reason, "Failed to open control group");
It makes code easier to understand and maintain if it is kept consistent. It is thus unexpected for open() error handling to be untouched while write() error handling is modified. I think the addition of errno in error handling of write() is helpful. Could you do the same for open()?
Okay, I'll add that, thanks.