Hi Shuah,
On 2021/7/28 20:32, Baolin Wang wrote:
Hi,
When running the openat2 test suite on ARM64 platform, we got below failure, since the definition of the O_LARGEFILE is different on ARM64. So we can set the correct O_LARGEFILE definition on ARM64 to fix this issue.
Sorry, I forgot to copy the failure log:
# openat2 unexpectedly returned # 3['/lkp/benchmarks/kernel_selftests/tools/testing/selftests/openat2'] with 208000 (!= 208000) not ok 102 openat2 with incompatible flags (O_PATH | O_LARGEFILE) fails with -22 (Invalid argument)
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com
Could you apply this patch if no objection from your side? Thanks.
tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c index d7ec1e7..1bddbe9 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c @@ -22,7 +22,11 @@ * XXX: This is wrong on {mips, parisc, powerpc, sparc}. */ #undef O_LARGEFILE +#ifdef __aarch64__ +#define O_LARGEFILE 0x20000 +#else #define O_LARGEFILE 0x8000 +#endif struct open_how_ext { struct open_how inner;