On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 8:22 AM Leon Hwang leon.hwang@linux.dev wrote:
Add test coverage for the new BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support in percpu maps. The following APIs are exercised:
- bpf_map_update_batch()
- bpf_map_lookup_batch()
- bpf_map_update_elem()
- bpf_map__update_elem()
- bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags()
- bpf_map__lookup_elem()
Add tests to verify that array and hash maps do not support BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags.
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang leon.hwang@linux.dev
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/percpu_alloc.c | 312 ++++++++++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_alloc_array.c | 32 ++ 2 files changed, 344 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/percpu_alloc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/percpu_alloc.c index 343da65864d6d..b9c3f5f6cd9c3 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/percpu_alloc.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/percpu_alloc.c @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 #include <test_progs.h> +#include "cgroup_helpers.h" #include "percpu_alloc_array.skel.h" #include "percpu_alloc_cgrp_local_storage.skel.h" #include "percpu_alloc_fail.skel.h" @@ -115,6 +116,305 @@ static void test_failure(void) { RUN_TESTS(percpu_alloc_fail); }
+static void test_percpu_map_op_cpu_flag(struct bpf_map *map, void *keys, size_t key_sz,
u32 max_entries, bool test_batch)+{
size_t value_sz = sizeof(u32), value_sz_cpus, value_sz_total;u32 *values = NULL, *values_percpu = NULL;int i, j, cpu, map_fd, nr_cpus, err;const u32 value = 0xDEADC0DE;u32 count = max_entries, v;u64 batch = 0, flags;void *values_row;LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_batch_opts, batch_opts);nr_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();if (!ASSERT_GT(nr_cpus, 0, "libbpf_num_possible_cpus"))return;value_sz_cpus = value_sz * nr_cpus;values = calloc(max_entries, value_sz_cpus);if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(values, "calloc values"))return;values_percpu = calloc(max_entries, roundup(value_sz, 8) * nr_cpus);if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(values_percpu, "calloc values_percpu")) {free(values);return;}value_sz_total = value_sz_cpus * max_entries;memset(values, 0, value_sz_total);map_fd = bpf_map__fd(map);flags = BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS;err = bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(map_fd, keys, values, flags);if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags cpu|all_cpus"))goto out;err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, keys, values, flags);if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "bpf_map_update_elem cpu|all_cpus"))goto out;flags = BPF_F_ALL_CPUS;err = bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(map_fd, keys, values, flags);if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags all_cpus"))goto out;flags = BPF_F_LOCK | BPF_F_CPU;err = bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(map_fd, keys, values, flags);if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags BPF_F_LOCK"))goto out;flags = BPF_F_LOCK | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS;err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, keys, values, flags);if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "bpf_map_update_elem BPF_F_LOCK"))goto out;flags = (u64)nr_cpus << 32 | BPF_F_CPU;err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, keys, values, flags);if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -ERANGE, "bpf_map_update_elem -ERANGE"))goto out;err = bpf_map__update_elem(map, keys, key_sz, values, value_sz, flags);if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -ERANGE, "bpf_map__update_elem -ERANGE"))goto out;err = bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(map_fd, keys, values, flags);if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -ERANGE, "bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags -ERANGE"))goto out;err = bpf_map__lookup_elem(map, keys, key_sz, values, value_sz, flags);if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -ERANGE, "bpf_map__lookup_elem -ERANGE"))goto out;for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpus; cpu++) {/* clear value on all cpus */values[0] = 0;flags = BPF_F_ALL_CPUS;for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) {err = bpf_map__update_elem(map, keys + i * key_sz, key_sz, values,value_sz, flags);if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map__update_elem all_cpus"))goto out;}/* update value on specified cpu */for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) {values[0] = value;flags = (u64)cpu << 32 | BPF_F_CPU;err = bpf_map__update_elem(map, keys + i * key_sz, key_sz, values,value_sz, flags);if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map__update_elem specified cpu"))goto out;/* lookup then check value on CPUs */for (j = 0; j < nr_cpus; j++) {flags = (u64)j << 32 | BPF_F_CPU;err = bpf_map__lookup_elem(map, keys + i * key_sz, key_sz, values,value_sz, flags);if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map__lookup_elem specified cpu"))goto out;if (!ASSERT_EQ(values[0], j != cpu ? 0 : value,"bpf_map__lookup_elem value on specified cpu"))goto out;
I was about to apply it, but noticed that the test is unstable. It fails 1 out of 10 for me in the above line. test_percpu_map_op_cpu_flag:PASS:bpf_map_lookup_batch value on specified cpu 0 nsec test_percpu_map_op_cpu_flag:FAIL:bpf_map_lookup_batch value on specified cpu unexpected bpf_map_lookup_batch value on specified cpu: actual 0 != expected 3735929054 #261/15 percpu_alloc/cpu_flag_lru_percpu_hash:FAIL #261 percpu_alloc:FAIL
Please investigate what is going on.
pw-bot: cr