Apologies for spam due to botched sending. Please disregard this (old) series. The replacement should come in
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220518161859.21565-1-mkoutny@suse.com
(That one is also not 100% correct, it's missing a Subject: therefore may not be pass through some filters.)
The 1st patch of that v2 series is at https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220518161859.21565-2-mkoutny@suse.com/
And I copy the cover letter here to be sure (and not to spam even more).
---->---- Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] memcontrol selftests fixups
Hello.
I'm just flushing the patches to make memcontrol selftests check the events behavior we had consensus about (test_memcg_low fails).
(test_memcg_reclaim, test_memcg_swap_max fail for me now but it's present even before the refactoring.)
The two bigger changes are: - adjustment of the protected values to make tests succeed with the given tolerance, - both test_memcg_low and test_memcg_min check protection of memory in populated cgroups (actually as per Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst memory.min should not apply to empty cgroups, which is not the case currently. Therefore I unified tests with the populated case in order to to bring more broken tests).
Thanks, Michal
Changes from v1 (https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220513171811.730-1-mkoutny@suse.com/) - fixed mis-rebase in compilation fix patch, - added review, ack tags from v1, - applied feedback from v1 (Octave script in git tree), - added one more patch extracting common parts, - rebased on mm-stable bbe832b9db2e. ----<----