On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 11:32:35AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/22/24 09:43, Laura Nao wrote:
Consider skipped tests in addition to passed tests when evaluating the overall result of the test suite in the finished() helper.
Signed-off-by: Laura Nao laura.nao@collabora.com
tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/ksft.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/ksft.py b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/ksft.py index cd89fb2bc10e..bf215790a89d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/ksft.py +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/ksft.py @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ def test_result(condition, description=""): def finished():
- if ksft_cnt["pass"] == ksft_num_tests:
- if ksft_cnt["pass"] + ksft_cnt["skip"] == ksft_num_tests:
Please don't. Counting skips in pass or fail isn't accurate reporting. skips need to be reported as skips.
Hi Shuah,
this won't change the skip count, just allow a test suite that has a mix of pass and skip results to exit with code 0. That's the same behavior as the C ksft_finished() helper in kselftest.h:
#define ksft_finished() \ ksft_exit(ksft_plan == \ ksft_cnt.ksft_pass + \ ksft_cnt.ksft_xfail + \ ksft_cnt.ksft_xskip)
It was my oversight to not do the same in the python helper.
Laura,
I consider this fixing an incorrect behavior, so I'd add this tag:
Fixes: dacf1d7a78bf ("kselftest: Add test to verify probe of devices from discoverable buses")
I think the message is good as is, but maybe it could have mentioned that this matches the behavior of the C helper, just to make the point above clearer.
Reviewed-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado nfraprado@collabora.com
And just a note for the maintainers, this patch depends on "kselftest: Move ksft helper module to common directory" https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240705-dev-err-log-selftest-v2-2-163b9cd7b3c1@... which was picked through the usb tree but is queued for 6.11-rc1.
Thanks, Nícolas