On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 14:58:51 +0200 Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
+static int tls_check_pending_rekey(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) +{
- const struct tls_msg *tlm = tls_msg(skb);
- const struct strp_msg *rxm = strp_msg(skb);
- if (tlm->control == TLS_RECORD_TYPE_HANDSHAKE) {
unlikely()
does the nachine code look worse if we flip the condition and return early instead of indenting the entire function?
char hs_type;
int err;
I'd probably err on the side of declaring those on the outside, but if we don't we should move rxm in here, it's not needed outside. Either, or.
if (rxm->full_len < 1)
return -EINVAL;
err = skb_copy_bits(skb, rxm->offset, &hs_type, 1);
if (err < 0)
return err;
if (hs_type == TLS_HANDSHAKE_KEYUPDATE) {
struct tls_context *ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
feels a bit like we should just pass ctx rather than sk?
struct tls_sw_context_rx *rx_ctx = ctx->priv_ctx_rx;
rx_ctx->key_update_pending = true;
}
- }
- return 0;
+}