On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 6:48 PM Vadim Fedorenko vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev wrote:
On 30/09/2024 10:24, Jason Xing wrote:
From: Jason Xing kernelxing@tencent.com
Even though this case is unlikely to happen, we have to avoid such a case occurring at an earlier point: the sk_rmem_alloc could get increased because of inserting more and more skbs into the errqueue when calling __skb_complete_tx_timestamp(). This bad case would stop the socket transmitting soon.
Signed-off-by: Jason Xing kernelxing@tencent.com
net/core/sock.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index fe87f9bd8f16..4bddd6f62e4f 100644 --- a/net/core/sock.c +++ b/net/core/sock.c @@ -905,6 +905,10 @@ int sock_set_timestamping(struct sock *sk, int optname, if (val & ~SOF_TIMESTAMPING_MASK) return -EINVAL;
if (val & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_RECORD_MASK &&!(val & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE))return -EINVAL;SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_RECORD_MASK contains SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE. That means that there will be no option to enable HW TX timestamping without enabling software timestamping. I believe this is wrong restriction.
Thanks! You are right. I should have realized that. I need to get rid of this one.
Thanks, Jason