On 2/6/23 17:46, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
Test successful exchange, unsuccessful exchange, storage key protection and invalid arguments.
Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch scgl@linux.ibm.com
I've had checkpatch have a look at this and there's an extra \n and a else after a return as well as a false-positive.
Could you provide me with a fixed patch as a reply to this mail?