On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 05:06:44PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Sun, May 22 2022 at 16:47, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 04:37:19PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Fri, Dec 03 2021 at 16:29, Greg KH wrote:
While I agree that we want to keep the number of licenses as small as possible, we cannot really dictate which dual licensing options a submitter selects unless the license is GPL-2.0-only incompatible, which copyleft-next is not.
Can we just get over this, add the license with the SPDX identifier and move on?
From what I recall, I had technical reasons I didn't take this series, but that was a long time ago and I would be glad to review it again if it were rebased and resubmitted after the next merge window is closed.
The license addition and the SPDX identifier cleanup should be seperated from the new test code which was part of the series.
I'll send a re-spin after the merge window and split this up.
And FWIW, AFAICT I addressed all the comments, so I can resend after the spdx stuff gets merged so to make the series easier to read / review.
Luis