21 Oct
2021
21 Oct
'21
3:22 p.m.
On 21/10/21 05:37, Michael Roth wrote:
Do we have to make a copy for the sparsebit? Why not just return the pointer? By looking at your subsequent patches, I find that this data structure seems to be just read-only?
Yes, it's only intended to be used for read access. But I'll if I can enforce that without the need to use a copy.
Return it as a const pointer?
Paolo