On 4/8/24 8:51 PM, Geliang Tang wrote:
+static void *send_recv_server(void *arg) +{
- struct send_recv_arg *a = (struct send_recv_arg *)arg;
 - ssize_t nr_sent = 0, bytes = 0;
 - char batch[1500];
 - int err = 0, fd;
 - fd = accept(a->fd, NULL, NULL);
 - while (fd == -1) {
 if (errno == EINTR)continue;err = -errno;goto done;- }
 - if (settimeo(fd, 0)) {
 err = -errno;goto done;- }
 - while (bytes < a->bytes && !READ_ONCE(a->stop)) {
 nr_sent = send(fd, &batch,MIN(a->bytes - bytes, sizeof(batch)),0);
if (nr_sent == -1 && errno == EINTR)continue;if (nr_sent == -1) {err = -errno;break;}bytes += nr_sent;- }
 - ASSERT_EQ(bytes, a->bytes, "send");
 +done:
- if (fd >= 0)
 close(fd);- if (err) {
 WRITE_ONCE(a->stop, 1);return ERR_PTR(err);- }
 - return NULL;
 +}
+void send_recv_data(int lfd, int fd, uint32_t total_bytes) +{
- ssize_t nr_recv = 0, bytes = 0;
 - struct send_recv_arg arg = {
 .fd = lfd,.bytes = total_bytes,.stop = 0,- };
 - pthread_t srv_thread;
 - void *thread_ret;
 - char batch[1500];
 - int err;
 - err = pthread_create(&srv_thread, NULL, send_recv_server,
 (void *)&arg);
- if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "pthread_create"))
 return;- /* recv total_bytes */
 - while (bytes < total_bytes && !READ_ONCE(arg.stop)) {
 nr_recv = recv(fd, &batch,MIN(total_bytes - bytes,sizeof(batch)), 0);
if (nr_recv == -1 && errno == EINTR)continue;if (nr_recv == -1)break;bytes += nr_recv;- }
 - ASSERT_EQ(bytes, total_bytes, "recv");
 I think we should avoid using ASSERT_* in network_helpers.c, but I'm not sure. What do you think?
There is log_err which is used by other helpers in network_helpers.c. May be use log_err instead and return int instead of void here. The caller can decide if it expects error or not and uses ASSERT accordingly.
pw-bot: cr