RE: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Fix spelling mistake "unpriviledged" -> "unprivileged"

Colin Ian King wrote:

There a couple of spelling mistakes, one in a literal string and one in a comment. Fix them.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King colin.i.king@gmail.com

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c index 3fb4f69b1962..e1a937277b54 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ .result = ACCEPT, }, {

• "calls: not on unpriviledged",

• "calls: not on unprivileged", .insns = { BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 2), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c index 187c6f6e32bc..d37f512fad16 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 1 },

• /* The unpriviledged case is not too interesting; variable

• /* The unprivileged case is not too interesting; variable
  • stack access is rejected.
  */ .errstr_unpriv = "R2 variable stack access prohibited for !root",

-- 2.37.1

Sure, but bpf-next.

Acked-by: John Fastabend john.fastabend@gmail.com