On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 1:44 PM Danilo Krummrich dakr@kernel.org wrote:
On 6/18/25 6:45 PM, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 3:54 PM Tamir Duberstein tamird@gmail.com wrote:
@Andreas Hindborg could you please have a look for configfs?
@Rafael J. Wysocki @Viresh Kumar could you please have a look for cpufreq?
Thanks Tamir.
Christian, Danilo, David, Greg, Tejun: It would also be nice to get Acked-by's for your bits. Thanks!
For the whole series and the bits I maintain:
Acked-by: Danilo Krummrich dakr@kernel.org
--
Independent from that, won't this potentially leave us with a lot of warnings from code that goes through other trees in the upcoming merge window? How do we deal with that?
I think the idea was to take this during rc so that all trees have it by the start of the next merge window. I'm not 100% clear on the kernel mechanics here, but that's my understanding.