+void vm_set_memory_encryption(struct kvm_vm *vm, bool enc_by_default, bool has_enc_bit,
uint8_t enc_bit)
+{
vm->memcrypt.enabled = true;
vm->memcrypt.enc_by_default = enc_by_default;
vm->memcrypt.has_enc_bit = has_enc_bit;
vm->memcrypt.enc_bit = enc_bit;
+}
+struct sparsebit * +vm_get_encrypted_phy_pages(struct kvm_vm *vm, int slot, vm_paddr_t *gpa_start,
uint64_t *size)
+{
struct userspace_mem_region *region;
struct sparsebit *encrypted_phy_pages;
if (!vm->memcrypt.enabled)
return NULL;
region = memslot2region(vm, slot);
if (!region)
return NULL;
encrypted_phy_pages = sparsebit_alloc();
sparsebit_copy(encrypted_phy_pages, region->encrypted_phy_pages);
Do we have to make a copy for the sparsebit? Why not just return the pointer? By looking at your subsequent patches, I find that this data structure seems to be just read-only?
-Mingwei