On 7/12/24 01:30, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Use kselftest wrapper to mark tests pass/fail instead of manually counting.
You care combining two changes in the patch.
This is needed to return correct exit status. This also
improves readability and mainability.
Spelling - "mainability" - checkpatch would have helped you catch this.
The change to return the correct error fine and but not the change thaT ADDS DUPLICATE tap header.
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum usama.anjum@collabora.com
tools/testing/selftests/x86/vdso_restorer.c | 20 +++++++------------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/vdso_restorer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/vdso_restorer.c index fe99f24341554..8e173d71291f6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/vdso_restorer.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/vdso_restorer.c @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ #include <unistd.h> #include <syscall.h> #include <sys/syscall.h> +#include "../kselftest.h" /* Open-code this -- the headers are too messy to easily use them. */ struct real_sigaction { @@ -44,9 +45,10 @@ static void handler_without_siginfo(int sig) int main() {
- int nerrs = 0; struct real_sigaction sa;
- ksft_print_header();
The problem with adding this header here is when make kselftest TARGETS=vDSO is run there will be duplicate TAP 13 headers.
- void *vdso = dlopen("linux-vdso.so.1", RTLD_LAZY | RTLD_LOCAL | RTLD_NOLOAD); if (!vdso)
@@ -57,6 +59,8 @@ int main() return 0; }
- ksft_set_plan(2);
- memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(sa)); sa.handler = handler_with_siginfo; sa.flags = SA_SIGINFO;
@@ -69,12 +73,7 @@ int main() raise(SIGUSR1);
- if (handler_called) {
printf("[OK]\tSA_SIGINFO handler returned successfully\n");
- } else {
printf("[FAIL]\tSA_SIGINFO handler was not called\n");
nerrs++;
- }
- ksft_test_result(handler_called, "SA_SIGINFO handler returned\n");
printf("[RUN]\tRaise a signal, !SA_SIGINFO, sa.restorer == NULL\n"); @@ -86,10 +85,5 @@ int main() raise(SIGUSR1);
- if (handler_called) {
printf("[OK]\t!SA_SIGINFO handler returned successfully\n");
- } else {
printf("[FAIL]\t!SA_SIGINFO handler was not called\n");
nerrs++;
- }
- ksft_test_result(handler_called, "SA_SIGINFO handler returned\n"); }
thanks, -- Shuah