23 May
2025
23 May
'25
9:38 p.m.
On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 07:53:37AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Nicolin Chen nicolinc@nvidia.com Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2025 11:21 AM
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct iopt_area { int iommu_prot; bool prevent_access : 1; unsigned int num_accesses;
- unsigned int num_owners;
What about 'num_locked' to directly mark out that this area is locked hence cannot be removed?
Yea. That sounds more straightforward to me. I will keep it plural "num_locks". And "is_owner" can be just "locks_area".
Thanks Nicolin