From: Andrew Jones ajones@ventanamicro.com
core_reg_fixup() complicates sharing the get-reg-list test with other architectures. Rather than work at keeping it, with plenty of #ifdeffery, just delete it, as it's unlikely to test a kernel based on anything older than v5.2 with the get-reg-list test, which is a test meant to check for regressions in new kernels. (And, an older version of the test can still be used for older kernels if necessary.)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones ajones@ventanamicro.com Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu haibo1.xu@intel.com --- .../selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c | 83 +++---------------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c index cb6b40e167d0..11630bbfb86b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c @@ -17,12 +17,10 @@ * by running the test with the --list command line argument. * * Note, the blessed list should be created from the oldest possible - * kernel. We can't go older than v4.15, though, because that's the first - * release to expose the ID system registers in KVM_GET_REG_LIST, see - * commit 93390c0a1b20 ("arm64: KVM: Hide unsupported AArch64 CPU features - * from guests"). Also, one must use the --core-reg-fixup command line - * option when running on an older kernel that doesn't include df205b5c6328 - * ("KVM: arm64: Filter out invalid core register IDs in KVM_GET_REG_LIST") + * kernel. We can't go older than v5.2, though, because that's the first + * release which includes df205b5c6328 ("KVM: arm64: Filter out invalid + * core register IDs in KVM_GET_REG_LIST"). Without that commit the core + * registers won't match expectations. */ #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> @@ -317,63 +315,6 @@ static void print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id) } }
-/* - * Older kernels listed each 32-bit word of CORE registers separately. - * For 64 and 128-bit registers we need to ignore the extra words. We - * also need to fixup the sizes, because the older kernels stated all - * registers were 64-bit, even when they weren't. - */ -static void core_reg_fixup(void) -{ - struct kvm_reg_list *tmp; - __u64 id, core_off; - int i; - - tmp = calloc(1, sizeof(*tmp) + reg_list->n * sizeof(__u64)); - - for (i = 0; i < reg_list->n; ++i) { - id = reg_list->reg[i]; - - if ((id & KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK) != KVM_REG_ARM_CORE) { - tmp->reg[tmp->n++] = id; - continue; - } - - core_off = id & ~REG_MASK; - - switch (core_off) { - case 0x52: case 0xd2: case 0xd6: - /* - * These offsets are pointing at padding. - * We need to ignore them too. - */ - continue; - case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs[0]) ... - KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs[31]): - if (core_off & 3) - continue; - id &= ~KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK; - id |= KVM_REG_SIZE_U128; - tmp->reg[tmp->n++] = id; - continue; - case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.fpsr): - case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.fpcr): - id &= ~KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK; - id |= KVM_REG_SIZE_U32; - tmp->reg[tmp->n++] = id; - continue; - default: - if (core_off & 1) - continue; - tmp->reg[tmp->n++] = id; - break; - } - } - - free(reg_list); - reg_list = tmp; -} - static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init) { struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; @@ -412,7 +353,6 @@ static void check_supported(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
static bool print_list; static bool print_filtered; -static bool fixup_core_regs;
static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) { @@ -433,9 +373,6 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
reg_list = vcpu_get_reg_list(vcpu);
- if (fixup_core_regs) - core_reg_fixup(); - if (print_list || print_filtered) { putchar('\n'); for_each_reg(i) { @@ -563,7 +500,7 @@ static void help(void)
printf( "\n" - "usage: get-reg-list [--config=<selection>] [--list] [--list-filtered] [--core-reg-fixup]\n\n" + "usage: get-reg-list [--config=<selection>] [--list] [--list-filtered]\n\n" " --config=<selection> Used to select a specific vcpu configuration for the test/listing\n" " '<selection>' may be\n");
@@ -577,7 +514,6 @@ static void help(void) "\n" " --list Print the register list rather than test it (requires --config)\n" " --list-filtered Print registers that would normally be filtered out (requires --config)\n" - " --core-reg-fixup Needed when running on old kernels with broken core reg listings\n" "\n" ); } @@ -609,9 +545,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av) pid_t pid;
for (i = 1; i < ac; ++i) { - if (strcmp(av[i], "--core-reg-fixup") == 0) - fixup_core_regs = true; - else if (strncmp(av[i], "--config", 8) == 0) + if (strncmp(av[i], "--config", 8) == 0) sel = parse_config(av[i]); else if (strcmp(av[i], "--list") == 0) print_list = true; @@ -654,8 +588,11 @@ int main(int ac, char **av) }
/* - * The current blessed list was primed with the output of kernel version + * The original blessed list was primed with the output of kernel version * v4.15 with --core-reg-fixup and then later updated with new registers. + * (The --core-reg-fixup option and it's fixup function have been removed + * from the test, as it's unlikely to use this type of test on a kernel + * older than v5.2.) * * The blessed list is up to date with kernel version v6.4 (or so we hope) */