There is a spelling mistake in a sig_print message. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King colin.i.king@gmail.com --- tools/testing/selftests/x86/xstate.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/xstate.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/xstate.c index 875777911d82..23c1d6c964ea 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/xstate.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/xstate.c @@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ static void validate_sigfpstate(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *ctx_void) if (get_xstatebv(xbuf) & xstate.mask) sig_print("[OK]\t'xfeatures' in XSAVE header is valid\n"); else - sig_print("[FAIL]\t'xfeatures' in XSAVE hader is not valid\n"); + sig_print("[FAIL]\t'xfeatures' in XSAVE header is not valid\n");
if (validate_xstate_same(stashed_xbuf, xbuf)) sig_print("[OK]\txstate delivery was successful\n");