On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 03:36:29PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 3:34 PM Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 04:28:19PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:53:42PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 2:40 PM Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:11:28PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:04 PM Bartosz Golaszewski brgl@bgdev.pl wrote:
Drop this patch and drop the line where the fwnode is assigned in gpio-sim.c. Then probe the device and print the addresses of the parent and child swnodes. See how they are the same and don't match the swnode hierarchy we created. You can then apply this patch and see how it becomes correct.
Thanks. I will give a spin.
Note, it seems I have to revert your older code first...
Okay, I have to postpone because simple revert doesn't work for me. Can you clean up the next, please and I can use it starting from tomorrow?
$ git tag --contains 5065e08e4ef3 DONT-USE-next-20211105 next-20211101 next-20211102 next-20211103 next-20211104 next-20211105 next-20211106 next-20211108 next-20211109 next-20211110 next-20211111 next-20211112 next-20211115 next-20211116 next-20211117 next-20211118 next-20211123 next-20211124 next-20211125 next-20211126 next-20211129 next-20211130 next-20211201
None of this is in next, please use: https://github.com/brgl/linux/tree/topic/gpio-sim-v12 if you want a branch.
It the old version that prevents me to apply (my branches based on next).
I just thought you were going to simply apply these patches.
That's correct, but see above.
Anyway, I'm already switched tasks for today. Maybe I will have some time later on.