On Wed, Aug 06, 2025 at 11:17:34AM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
SNIP
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile index 910d8d6402ef..68cf6a9cf05f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile @@ -759,6 +759,14 @@ TRUNNER_BPF_BUILD_RULE := $$(error no BPF objects should be built) TRUNNER_BPF_CFLAGS := $(eval $(call DEFINE_TEST_RUNNER,test_maps)) +# Use -O2 optimization to generate SIB addressing usdt argument spec +# Only apply on x86 architecture where SIB addressing is relevant +ifeq ($(ARCH), x86) +$(OUTPUT)/usdt_o2.test.o: CFLAGS:=$(subst O0,O2,$(CFLAGS)) +$(OUTPUT)/cpuv4/usdt_o2.test.o: CFLAGS:=$(subst O0,O2,$(CFLAGS)) +$(OUTPUT)/no_alu32/usdt_o2.test.o: CFLAGS:=$(subst O0,O2,$(CFLAGS)) +endif
I tried your selftest with gcc14 and llvm20 in my environment. See below:
llvm20: Displaying notes found in: .note.stapsdt Owner Data size Description stapsdt 0x0000002f NT_STAPSDT (SystemTap probe descriptors) Provider: test Name: usdt1 Location: 0x00000000000003ac, Base: 0x0000000000000000, Semaphore: 0x0000000000000000 Arguments: 8@-64(%rbp)
gcc14: Displaying notes found in: .note.stapsdt Owner Data size Description stapsdt 0x00000034 NT_STAPSDT (SystemTap probe descriptors) Provider: test Name: usdt1 Location: 0x0000000000000334, Base: 0x0000000000000000, Semaphore: 0x0000000000000000 Arguments: 8@array(,%rax,8)
llvm20 and gcc14 generate different usdt patterns. '8@-64(%rbp)' already supports so with SIB support, the test should pass CI, I think.
I see the same with gcc 15 and clang 20
Arguments: 8@array(,%rax,8)
jirka