On 14 Feb 2024, at 4:14, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 13.02.24 22:55, Zi Yan wrote:
From: Zi Yan ziy@nvidia.com
We do not have non power of two pages, using nr is error prone if nr is not power-of-two. Use page order instead.
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan ziy@nvidia.com
include/linux/page_owner.h | 8 ++++---- mm/huge_memory.c | 2 +- mm/page_alloc.c | 4 ++-- mm/page_owner.c | 3 ++- 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/page_owner.h b/include/linux/page_owner.h index 119a0c9d2a8b..d7878523adfc 100644 --- a/include/linux/page_owner.h +++ b/include/linux/page_owner.h @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ extern struct page_ext_operations page_owner_ops; extern void __reset_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned short order); extern void __set_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned short order, gfp_t gfp_mask); -extern void __split_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned int nr); +extern void __split_page_owner(struct page *page, int order); extern void __folio_copy_owner(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *old); extern void __set_page_owner_migrate_reason(struct page *page, int reason); extern void __dump_page_owner(const struct page *page); @@ -31,10 +31,10 @@ static inline void set_page_owner(struct page *page, __set_page_owner(page, order, gfp_mask); } -static inline void split_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned int nr) +static inline void split_page_owner(struct page *page, int order) { if (static_branch_unlikely(&page_owner_inited))
__split_page_owner(page, nr);
__split_page_owner(page, order);@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static inline void set_page_owner(struct page *page, { } static inline void split_page_owner(struct page *page,
unsigned short order)
int order)I assume this will fit into a single line now.
Sure.
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand david@redhat.com
Thanks.
-- Best Regards, Yan, Zi