On 2024/10/22 12:40, Nicolin Chen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 10:28:30AM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
On 2024/10/22 8:19, Nicolin Chen wrote:
- @viommu_alloc: Allocate an iommufd_viommu on a physical IOMMU instance behind
the @dev, as the set of virtualization resources shared/passed
to user space IOMMU instance. And associate it with a nesting
@parent_domain. The @viommu_type must be defined in the header
include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h
It is suggested to call iommufd_viommu_alloc() helper for
a bundled allocation of the core and the driver structures,
using the given @ictx pointer.
- @pgsize_bitmap: bitmap of all possible supported page sizes
- @owner: Driver module providing these ops
- @identity_domain: An always available, always attachable identity
@@ -591,6 +601,10 @@ struct iommu_ops { void (*remove_dev_pasid)(struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid, struct iommu_domain *domain);
struct iommufd_viommu *(*viommu_alloc)(struct device *dev, struct iommu_domain *parent_domain,struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, unsigned int viommu_type);Is the vIOMMU object limited to a parent domain?
Yes, for each vIOMMU (a slice of physical IOMMU per VM), one S2 parent domain is enough. Typically, it has the mappings between gPAs and hPAs. If its format/compatibility allows, this single parent domain can be shared with other vIOMMUs.
Is it feasible to make vIOMMU object more generic, rather than strictly tying it to nested translation? For example, a normal paging domain that translates gPAs to hPAs could also have a vIOMMU object associated with it.
While we can only support vIOMMU object allocation uAPI for S2 paging domains in the context of this series, we could consider leaving the option open to associate a vIOMMU object with other normal paging domains that are not a nested parent?
Thanks, baolu