9 Mar
2022
9 Mar
'22
9:29 a.m.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 1:36 AM Matthew Wilcox willy@infradead.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 11:08:29AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
+``LLVM=0`` is not the same as omitting ``LLVM`` altogether, it will behave like +``LLVM=1``.
Hmm... I can see someone's build wrappers setting LLVM=1, then them being surprised that appending LLVM=0 doesn't disable LLVM=1 as they might expect. But Masahiro says let's fix this later which is fine.
What happens if you say LLVM= instead of LLVM=0 ? Would that "undo" a prior LLVM=1 and use GCC instead?
I think so.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada