From: Nicolin Chen nicolinc@nvidia.com Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2023 2:58 AM
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 08:56:25AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Yi Liu yi.l.liu@intel.com Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 10:39 PM
@@ -88,7 +90,10 @@ iommufd_hw_pagetable_alloc(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, struct iommufd_ioas *ioas, refcount_inc(&ioas->obj.users); hwpt->ioas = ioas;
hwpt->domain = iommu_domain_alloc(idev->dev->bus);
if (ops->domain_alloc_user)
hwpt->domain = ops->domain_alloc_user(idev->dev, NULL,
NULL);
else
hwpt->domain = iommu_domain_alloc(idev->dev->bus);
this reminds the comment for @domain_alloc_user() should clarify that UNMANGED domain type is assumed when no user data is provided, to be compatible with iommu_domain_alloc().
Yes. Perhaps:
- @domain_alloc_user: allocate user iommu domain. A valid user_data
pointer and
a parent pointer to a kernel-managed domain are required
to allocate an IOMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED domain. Otherwise,
the
new domain will be set to an IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED
type.
yes, this is clearer.