On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 12:05 AM Miaohe Lin linmiaohe@huawei.com wrote:
On 2024/6/25 0:33, Jiaqi Yan wrote:
Add regression and new tests when hugepage has correctable memory
...
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb-soft-offline.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb-soft-offline.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..16fe52f972e2 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb-soft-offline.c @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/*
- Test soft offline behavior for HugeTLB pages:
- if enable_soft_offline = 0, hugepages should stay intact and soft
- offlining failed with EINVAL.
s/failed with EINVAL/failed with EOPNOTSUPP/g
To be fixed in v6.
- if enable_soft_offline = 1, a hugepage should be dissolved and
- nr_hugepages/free_hugepages should be reduced by 1.
- Before running, make sure more than 2 hugepages of default_hugepagesz
- are allocated. For example, if /proc/meminfo/Hugepagesize is 2048kB:
- echo 8 > /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages
- */
...
+static void test_soft_offline_common(int enable_soft_offline) +{
int fd;
int expect_errno = enable_soft_offline ? 0 : EOPNOTSUPP;
struct statfs file_stat;
unsigned long hugepagesize_kb = 0;
unsigned long nr_hugepages_before = 0;
unsigned long nr_hugepages_after = 0;
int ret;
ksft_print_msg("Test soft-offline when enabled_soft_offline=%d\n",
enable_soft_offline);
fd = create_hugetlbfs_file(&file_stat);
if (fd < 0) {
ksft_exit_fail_msg("Failed to create hugetlbfs file\n");
return;
}
hugepagesize_kb = file_stat.f_bsize / 1024;
ksft_print_msg("Hugepagesize is %ldkB\n", hugepagesize_kb);
if (set_enable_soft_offline(enable_soft_offline)) {
ksft_exit_fail_msg("Failed to set enable_soft_offline\n");
Call destroy_hugetlbfs_file() in error path?
As the counterpart of destroy_hugetlbfs_file, I think the test only needs to close(fd). Will add it in v6.
return;
}
if (read_nr_hugepages(hugepagesize_kb, &nr_hugepages_before) != 0) {
ksft_exit_fail_msg("Failed to read nr_hugepages\n");
return;
}
ksft_print_msg("Before MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE nr_hugepages=%ld\n",
nr_hugepages_before);
ret = do_soft_offline(fd, 2 * file_stat.f_bsize, expect_errno);
if (read_nr_hugepages(hugepagesize_kb, &nr_hugepages_after) != 0) {
ksft_exit_fail_msg("Failed to read nr_hugepages\n");
return;
}
ksft_print_msg("After MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE nr_hugepages=%ld\n",
nr_hugepages_after);
if (enable_soft_offline) {
if (nr_hugepages_before != nr_hugepages_after + 1) {
ksft_test_result_fail("MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE should reduced 1 hugepage\n");
return;
}
} else {
if (nr_hugepages_before != nr_hugepages_after) {
ksft_test_result_fail("MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE reduced %lu hugepages\n",
nr_hugepages_before - nr_hugepages_after);
return;
}
}
ksft_test_result(ret == 0,
"Test soft-offline when enabled_soft_offline=%d\n",
enable_soft_offline);
Call destroy_hugetlbfs_file() when test finished ?
Test can just close(fd) once nr_hugepages_after is read.
Thanks. .