Remove `pr_debug` calls which emit information already contained in `pr_warn` calls that occur on test failure. This reduces unhelpful test verbosity.
Note that a `pr_debug` removed from `_check_numbers_template` appears to have been the only guard against silent false positives, but in fact this condition is handled in `_test`; it is only possible for `n_args` to be `0` in `_check_numbers_template` if the test explicitly expects it *and* `vsscanf` returns `0`, matching the expectation.
Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein tamird@gmail.com --- lib/test_scanf.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_scanf.c b/lib/test_scanf.c index d1664e0d0138..efdde6f498d9 100644 --- a/lib/test_scanf.c +++ b/lib/test_scanf.c @@ -62,10 +62,8 @@ _test(const char *file, const int line, check_fn fn, const void *check_data, con
#define _check_numbers_template(arg_fmt, expect, str, fmt, n_args, ap) \ do { \ - pr_debug(""%s", "%s" ->\n", str, fmt); \ for (; n_args > 0; n_args--, expect++) { \ typeof(*expect) got = *va_arg(ap, typeof(expect)); \ - pr_debug("\t" arg_fmt "\n", got); \ if (got != *expect) { \ pr_warn("%s:%d, vsscanf("%s", "%s", ...) expected " arg_fmt " got " arg_fmt "\n", \ file, line, str, fmt, *expect, got); \ @@ -689,7 +687,6 @@ do { \ total_tests++; \ len = snprintf(test_buffer, BUF_SIZE, gen_fmt, expect); \ got = (fn)(test_buffer, &endp, base); \ - pr_debug(#fn "("%s", %d) -> " gen_fmt "\n", test_buffer, base, got); \ if (got != (expect)) { \ fail = true; \ pr_warn(#fn "("%s", %d): got " gen_fmt " expected " gen_fmt "\n", \