Hi David,
On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 8:16 AM David Gow davidgow@google.com wrote:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 09:38, Stephen Boyd sboyd@kernel.org wrote:
Document the linux,kunit board compatible string. This board is loaded into the Linux kernel when KUnit is testing devicetree dependent code.
As with the series as a whole, this might need to change a little bit if we want to either use devicetree overlays and/or other architectures.
That being said, I'm okay with having this until then: the only real topic for bikeshedding is the name.
- Is KUnit best as a board name, or part of the vendor name?
- Do we want to include the architecture in the name?
Should it be "linux,kunit", "linux-kunit,uml", "linux,kunit-uml", etc?
I would not include an architecture (or virtualization method), as this is independent of the architecture or virtualization method.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert