Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] xfrm & bonding: Correct use of xso.real_dev

On Thu, 2025-04-10 at 14:10 +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:

Thank you for following up on this. It's definitely not getting cleaner with a bond ptr in xfrm protected by two locks in different drivers, but it should do AFAICT. In case there is another version I'd add a big comment of the locking expectations for real_dev, and maybe in the future it can fully move to the bonding as well.

For the set: Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov razor@blackwall.org

Thanks for the review, I'll send v3 with the comment added. I would have liked to push this a bit further with making real_dev private, but I didn't find a way and that can be done separately.

Cosmin.